Adrian Charles Banks v. State of South Carolina

11-1670Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 8, 2011

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1670
ADRIAN CHARLES BANKS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (8:10-cv-03031-JMC)
Submitted: October 18, 2011 Decided: November 8, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adrian Charles Banks, Appellant Pro Se. James Emory Smith, Jr.,
Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Adrian Charles Banks appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Banks v. South Carolina,
No. 8:10-cv-03031-JMC (D.S.C. May 31, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.