The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1660•Ronnie Ore v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail
11-1660Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 24, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1660
RONNIE ORE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL JAIL,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (2:11-cv-00244-RGD-FBS)
Submitted: October 18, 2011 Decided: October 24, 2011
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronnie Ore, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ronnie Ore appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28
U.S.C.A. § 1915(e) (West Supp. 2011). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Ore v. Hampton Rds.
Reg’l Jail, No. 2:11-cv-00244-RGD-FBS (E.D. Va. June 9, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.