The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1647•Eric M. McMillian v. L. G. LECONEY, Officer, Raleigh Police Department
11-1647Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 22, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1647
ERIC M. MCMILLIAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
L. G. LECONEY, Officer, Raleigh Police Department,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:09-cv-00175-BR)
Submitted: November 17, 2011 Decided: November 22, 2011
Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric M. McMillian, Appellant Pro Se. Hunt Kang Choi, CITY
ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eric M. McMillian appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See McMillian v. LeConey, No. 5:09-cv-00175-BR (E.D.N.C.
filed May 31 & entered June 2, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.