The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1629•Deirdre C. Glascoe v. Charles J. Martoff; Kate J. Francis
11-1629Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 17, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1629
DEIRDRE C. GLASCOE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CHARLES J. MARTOFF; KATE J. FRANCIS,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
MONIFA N. BAILEY; JANE DOE #1; JANE DOE #2,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:09-cv-00708-GBL-TCB)
Submitted: November 15, 2011 Decided: November 17, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Deirdre C. Glascoe, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Douglas Lane,
THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Deirdre C. Glascoe appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Appellees, denying Glascoe’s motion
for judgment as a matter of law, and ruling on other pending
motions. She also appeals the court’s denial of her
post-judgment motion for new trial. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both
orders for the reasons stated by the district court. Glascoe v.
Martoff, No. 1:09-cv-00708-GBL-TCB (E.D. Va., Apr. 20, May 19,
2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.