The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1576•Rudolph McCollum, Sr. v. TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Local 527
11-1576Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 29, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1576
RUDOLPH MCCOLLUM, SR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Local 527,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
GENCO INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00210-JRS)
Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided: August 29, 2011
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rudolph McCollum, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard S. Edelman,
O’DONNELL, SCHWARTZ & ANDERSON, PC, Washington, D.C., James J.
Vergara, Jr., VERGARA & ASSOCIATES, Hopewell, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rudolph McCollum, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing as untimely his employment discrimination
action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised
in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because
McCollum’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the
district court’s disposition, McCollum has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.