The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1549•Kimberly Ann Shreve v. Kristen Lynn Fetter; Tina Tant Hoagland; C. Colon Willoughby, Jr.
11-1549Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 1, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1549
KIMBERLY ANN SHREVE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KRISTEN LYNN FETTER; TINA TANT HOAGLAND; C. COLON
WILLOUGHBY, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-00157-H)
Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 1, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kimberly Ann Shreve, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kimberly Ann Shreve appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing
her civil action. On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because Shreve’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for
the district court’s disposition, Shreve has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.