Full text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1528
In re: JAMES SWEETS, a/k/a Sweets,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:04-cr-00564-CCB-4)
Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 5, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Dana Sweets, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Sweets petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his
Motion for Order Directing Discharged Counsel to Return
Defendant’s Files and Records. He seeks an order from this
court directing the district court to act. Our review of the
district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied
Sweets’ motion on May 13, 2011. Accordingly, because the
district court has recently decided Sweets’ case, we deny the
mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
