The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1522•David C. Diemer v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
11-1522Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 4, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1522
DAVID C. DIEMER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (13123-10L)
Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 4, 2011
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David C. Diemer, Appellant Pro Se. Gilbert Steven Rothenberg,
Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Robert William Metzler,
Laurie Allyn Snyder, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Tax
Division, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David C. Diemer appeals the tax court’s order
sustaining the Commissioner’s collection determination and
imposing sanctions pursuant to I.R.C. § 6673 (2006). We have
reviewed the record and the tax’s court opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the tax court. Diemer v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, Tax Ct.
No. 13123-10L (U.S. Tax Ct. Feb. 16, 2011). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.