The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1518•Ivory L. Hawkins v. Arc-Tech, Incorporated
11-1518Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 4, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1518
IVORY L. HAWKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ARC-TECH, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (2:10-cv-00447-RBS-DEM)
Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 4, 2011
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ivory L. Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Charles Gulin,
PARGAMENT & HALLOWELL, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ivory L. Hawkins appeals the district court’s order
denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
substantially on the reasoning of the district court.
Hawkins v. Arc-Tech, Inc., No. 2:10-cv-00447-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va.
Apr. 15, 2011). Hawkins’ pending motion for transcripts at the
Government’s expense is denied. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.