The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1491•Patrick O. Christian v. James Townsend; Rodney Moore; Daniel E. Bailey, Jr.; Robert B. Nipper
11-1491Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 4, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1491
PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JAMES TOWNSEND; RODNEY MOORE; DANIEL E. BAILEY, JR.;
ROBERT B. NIPPER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00140-RJC-DSC)
Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 4, 2011
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick O. Christian, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Patrick O. Christian appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2006) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Christian v. Townsend, No. 3:11-cv-00140-RJC-DSC (W.D.N.C.
Apr. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.