The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1484•Javier Diaz-Bey; Stephanie Shackleford v. Ron Havner
11-1484Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 20, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1484
JAVIER DIAZ-BEY; STEPHANIE SHACKLEFORD,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
RON HAVNER,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (4:11-cv-00063-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: June 16, 2011 Decided: June 20, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Javier Diaz-Bey, Stephanie Shackleford, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Javier Diaz-Bey and Stephanie Shackleford appeal the
district court’s order dismissing their complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006) for failure to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Diaz-Bey v. Havner,
No. 4:11-cv-00063-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 19, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.