The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1452•Qihui Huang v. Philip E. Culpepper
11-1452Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 21, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1452
QIHUI HUANG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
SHIELD OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND JUSTICE, INCORPORATED,
Plaintiff,
v.
PHILIP E. CULPEPPER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:10-cv-00089-DKC)
Submitted: August 22, 2011 Decided: September 21, 2011
Before WILKINSON and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Qihui Huang, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Radding, Geoffrey W.
Washington, ADELBERG, RUDOW, DORF & HENDLER, LLC, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Qihui Huang appeals the district court’s order denying
her motion for an extension of time in which to file a second
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Huang v. Culpepper, No.
8:10-cv-00089-DKC (D. Md. Apr. 20, 2011). We deny all of
Huang’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.