Lawrence F. Glaser, individually v. Enzo Biochem, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1439
LAWRENCE F. GLASER, individually and on behalf of Kimberly,
Erin, Hannah and Benjamin Glaser,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
MAUREEN GLASER, individually and on behalf of Kimberly,
Erin, Hannah and Benjamin Glaser,
Plaintiff,
v.
ENZO BIOCHEM, INCORPORATED; HEIMAN GROSS; BARRY WEINER;
ELAZAR RABBANI; SHARIM RABBANI; JOHN DELUCCA; DEAN
ENGELHARDT,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
RICHARD KEATING; DOUG YATES; JOHN DOE, 1-50,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:02-cv-01242-GBL)
Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 4, 2011
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Lawrence F. Glaser, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Howard Chase,
MORRISON & COHEN, LLP, New York, New York; Robert Richardson
Vieth, COOLEY, GODWARD & KRONISH, LLP, Reston, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence F. Glaser appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60
and motion for sanctions, which were filed in his civil action.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Glaser v. Enzo Biochem, Inc., No. 1:02-cv-01242-GBL
(E.D. Va. Apr. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --