The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1400•Taylor Stone Witt v. CABLE AD CONCEPTS, INCORPORATED, a Washington corporation
11-1400Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 25, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1400
TAYLOR STONE WITT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CABLE AD CONCEPTS, INCORPORATED, a Washington corporation;
NORTHLAND CABLE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a Washington
corporation,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
CABLE AD CONCEPTS; NORTHLAND CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(8:08-cv-03778-HFF)
Submitted: July 21, 2011 Decided: July 25, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Taylor Stone Witt, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Allen Bright,
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Taylor Stone Witt appeals the district court’s order
denying as untimely her motion to amend her complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. As Witt filed
her motion after the district court dismissed her complaint with
prejudice, the motion was clearly untimely. Accordingly, we
affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.