The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1353•Inetha M. Carr v. H.O.P.E. COMMUNITY SERVICE, INC., f/k/a Central Piedmont Action Council,…
11-1353Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 23, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1353
INETHA M. CARR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
H.O.P.E. COMMUNITY SERVICE, INC., f/k/a Central Piedmont
Action Council, Incorporated, f/k/a C-PAC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:11-cv-00159-JRS)
Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 23, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Inetha Michelle Carr, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Inetha Michelle Carr appeals the district court’s
order granting her motion to proceed in forma pauperis and
summarily dismissing her complaint for failing to state a claim.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Carr v. H.O.P.E. Community Serv., No. 3:11-cv-00159-
JRS (E.D. Va. Mar. 24, 2011). We deny Carr’s motions for a
formal hearing and for a transcript at Government’s expense. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.