The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1346•Gregory Byers, on behalf of Nicole Byers v. Marlboro County School District
11-1346Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 22, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1346
GREGORY BYERS, on behalf of Nicole Byers,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MARLBORO COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:10-cv-01367-TLW)
Submitted: August 18, 2011 Decided: August 22, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Byers, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gregory Byers appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, filed on behalf
of his daughter. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Byers v. Marlboro County Sch. Dist., No.
4:10-cv-01367-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.