The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1290•Peter Kalos; Veron Lee Kalos v. Shannon J. Posner; Shannon J. Posner, P.a.
11-1290Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 25, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1290
PETER KALOS; VERON LEE KALOS,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
SHANNON J. POSNER; SHANNON J. POSNER, P.A.,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00073-JCC-TRJ)
Submitted: July 21, 2011 Decided: July 25, 2011
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter Kalos; Vernon Lee Kalos, Appellants Pro Se. Matthew Allan
Ranck, ECCLESTON & WOLF PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Peter and Vernon Lee Kalos appeal the district court’s
order dismissing the Kalos’ complaint with prejudice as barred
by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Kalos v. Posner, No.
1:10-cv-00073-JCC-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 23, 2011 & entered
Feb. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.