The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1283•Tyrone Andrews v. Thomas P. Davis
11-1283Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 22, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1283
TYRONE ANDREWS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
THOMAS P. DAVIS,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:09-cv-00297-BO)
Submitted: August 18, 2011 Decided: August 22, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Andrews, Appellant Pro Se. Grady L. Balentine, Jr.,
Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Andrews appeals the district court’s orders
denying his various pretrial motions and a final order denying
relief on his employment discrimination complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Andrews v. Davis, No. 5:09-cv-00297-BO (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2009;
July 13, 2009; Jan. 19, 2011; Feb. 11, 2011; Feb. 23, 2011;
March 4, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.