The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1248•Darly-Morgan D. Makabin v. G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA), INCORPORATED, a/k/a G4S Wackenhut
11-1248Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 4, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1248
DARLY-MORGAN D. MAKABIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA), INCORPORATED, a/k/a G4S
Wackenhut,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge and Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge.
(3:10-cv-00441-FDW-DCK; 3:10-cv-00463-RJC-DCK)
Submitted: September 29, 2011 Decided: October 4, 2011
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darly-Morgan D. Makabin, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lawrence
Wade, Jr., OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darly-Morgan D. Makabin appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his employment discrimination claims. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Makabin v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA), Inc. (W.D.N.C. Mar. 11,
2011). We deny all Makabin’s pending motions and we dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.