The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1219•Joseph V. Veiga, Iii v. Suntrust Bank
11-1219Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 17, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1219
JOSEPH V. VEIGA, III; SUSAN M. VEIGA, on their own behalf
and on behalf of all others similarly situated; MARY
KENDALL,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
SUNTRUST BANK,
Defendant – Appellee,
v.
AARON HOLSEY,
Movant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Paul W. Grimm, Magistrate Judge.
(1:09-cv-02815-PWG)
Submitted: September 30, 2011 Decided: October 17, 2011
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aaron Holsey, Appellant Pro Se. Harold G. Belkowitz, OBER,
KALER, GRIMES & SHRIVER, PC, Washington, D.C.; Diane Festino
Schmitt, OBER, KALER, GRIMES & SHRIVER, PC, Baltimore, Maryland,
-- 1 of 3 --
2
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Aaron Holsey appeals the order of the magistrate judge
approving the settlement of this class action lawsuit and
rejecting Holsey’s objection to the settlement. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge.
Veiga v. Holsey, No. 1:09-cv-02815-PWG (D. Md. filed Feb. 23,
2011, entered Feb. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.