The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1207•Teresa A. Ratledge v. Science Applications International Corporation
11-1207Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 24, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1207
TERESA A. RATLEDGE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,
Defendant – Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Party-in-Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00239-CMH-TCB)
Submitted: October 20, 2011 Decided: October 24, 2011
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jay Ian Igiel, NEALON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia;
Howard N. Berliner, BERLINER LAW FIRM, PLLC, Washington, D.C.,
for Appellant. Brian Z. Liss, SAIC, McLean, Virginia; Robert R.
Sparks, Jr., SPARKS & CRAIG, LLP, McLean, Virginia, for
Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Teresa A. Ratledge appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Ratledge v. Science Applications Int’l Corp., No. 1:10-cv-00239-
CMH-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 10, 2011; entered Feb. 11, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.