The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1199•Clarence Carter Moore v. Richmond Nursing Home
11-1199Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 23, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1199
CLARENCE CARTER MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHMOND NURSING HOME; BORIS T. SIMMONS, Police Officer; BERYL
T. CARTER, Director of Jose B. Gotay, M.D., D.P.H.; JOSE B.
GOTAY, M.D., D.P.H.; MANNED DEESE, City Manager; GENEVA D.
AUSTIN, Administrator,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:10-cv-00833-HEH)
Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 23, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Carter Moore, Appellant Pro Se. M. Janet Palmer, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Carter Moore appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint as time-
barred. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Moore v. Richmond Nursing Home, No. 3:10-cv-
00833-HEH (E.D. Va. Feb. 10, 2011). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.