The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1172•James Riffin v. MARK JEROME FRIEDMAN, Trustee -
11-1172Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 13, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1172
JAMES RIFFIN,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
MARK JEROME FRIEDMAN,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:10-cv-02618-CCB; 10-11248-DK)
Submitted: August 31, 2011 Decided: September 13, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Riffin, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Jerome Friedman, DLA PIPER
US LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Riffin appeals the district court’s order
affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting the Trustee’s
motion for approval of a settlement agreement, to cooperate to
obtain access to a letter of credit, and to modify, as
necessary, the automatic stay, 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) (2006). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Riffin v. Friedman, Nos. 1:10-cv-02618-CCB; 10-11248-DK
(D. Md. Feb. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.