The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1171•Christopher F. Goad, Sr. v. William R. Gray
11-1171Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 1, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1171
CHRISTOPHER F. GOAD, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM R. GRAY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00326-REP)
Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 1, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Fred Goad, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher F. Goad, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his civil action for lack of diversity jurisdiction.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Goad v. Gray, No. 3:10-cv-00326-REP (E.D. Va. Nov. 15,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.