The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1161•ANTHONY L. MCNAIR, Apostle v. Rocky Mount District Attorney’s Office
11-1161Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 15, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1161
ANTHONY L. MCNAIR, Apostle,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ROCKY MOUNT DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,
Defendant – Appellee.
No. 11-1162
ANTHONY L. MCNAIR, Apostle,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ROCKY MOUNT POLICE DEPARTMENT; J. WAYNE SEARS; JENNY L.
MATTHEWS,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:10-cv-00546-FL; 5:10-cv-00561-FL)
Submitted: April 11, 2011 Decided: April 15, 2011
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony L. McNair, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Anthony L. McNair appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendations of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaints under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). Because McNair’s informal
briefs fail to address the district court’s basis for dismissing
his complaints, this issue has been abandoned. See 4th Cir. R.
34(b); Wahi v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc., 562 F.3d 599,
607 (4th Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 1140 (2010).
Accordingly, we deny McNair’s motions for protection and affirm
the district court’s order. McNair v. Rocky Mount Dist. Att’y’s
Office, No. 5:10-cv-00546-FL; McNair v. Rocky Mount Police
Dep’t, No. 5:10-cv-00561-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2011;
Jan. 25, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.