The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1116•Kwame Gyamfi v. Wells-Fargo-Wachovia Bank; Wells Fargo Bank, Corp
11-1116Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 29, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1116
KWAME GYAMFI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WELLS-FARGO-WACHOVIA BANK; WELLS FARGO BANK, CORP,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District
Judge. (8:09-cv-03001-DKC)
Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided: August 29, 2011
Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.*
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kwame Gyamfi, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Gaumont, WOMBLE
CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
* The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46)d) (2006).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kwame Gyamfi appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for a default judgment, denying
reconsideration of that order, and dismissing his claims filed
under the Bank Secrecy Act, the United States Patriot Act, and
the Right to Financial Privacy Act. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Gyamfi v. Wells-Fargo-
Wachovia Bank, No. 8:09-cv-03001-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2010,
June 15, 2010, Dec. 14, 2010, & Jan. 31, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.