Erwin B. Patterson, Jr. v. Towne Bank

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1113
ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.,
Plaintiff ─ Appellant,
v.
TOWNE BANK; WILLIAM A. COPELAND; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN; ROBERT
HENRY BURGER; ROBERT L. SAMUELS, JR.; CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA;
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA;
RAYMOND A. JACKSON,
Defendants ─ Appellees.
No. 11-1117
ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; SARA A. JOHN; STUART GORDON;
JOHN C. LUMPKIN; JOHN C. LUMPKIN, P.C.; JON AHERN; SYKES,
BOURBON, AHERN & LEVY P.C.; JOSEPH FRANKLIN VERSER; LEONARD C.
HEATH, JR.; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY; TOWNE
MORTGAGE; TOWNE BANK; WILLIAM A. COPELAND; WILLIAM T. HODSDEN,
Defendants – Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
No. 11-1231
ERWIN B. PATTERSON, JR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; TEIDE ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED;
STUART GORDON; SARA A. JOHN, Esq.; JOHN C. LUMPKIN, Esq.; JOHN
C. LUMPKIN P.C.; JOHN AHERN, Esq.; JOSEPH FRANKLIN VERSER, Esq.;
LEONARD C. HEATH, JR., Esq.; CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE
COMPANY; TOWNE-MORTGAGE; TOWNE BANK; WILLIAM COPELAND;
WILLIAM T. HODSDEN,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith; Raymond
A. Jackson, District Judges. (2:10-cv-00437-RBS-FBS; 2:10-cv-
00434-RBS-FBS; 2:10-cv-00614-RBS-FBS)
Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 5, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Erwin B. Patterson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated cases, Erwin B. Patterson, Jr.,
appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil
complaints without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the records and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Towne Bank,
No. 2:10-cv-00437-RBS-FBS; Patterson v. Teide Enters., Inc., No.
2:10-cv-00434-RBS-FBS; and Patterson v. United States, No. 2:10-
cv-00614-RBS-FBS (E.D. Va. Nov. 23, 2010; Nov. 5, 2010; and
Jan. 12, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --