The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1100•ANTHONY LEE MCNAIR, Apostle v. TARBORO DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE; WAYNE SHELTON BOYETTE, State Counselor
11-1100Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 21, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1100
ANTHONY LEE MCNAIR, Apostle,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
TARBORO DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE; WAYNE SHELTON BOYETTE,
State Counselor,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:10-cv-00545-FL)
Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 21, 2011
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Lee McNair, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Lee McNair appeals the district court’s order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing as frivolous McNair’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006)
complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McNair
v. Tarboro Dist. Att’y’s Office, No. 5:10-cv-00545-FL (E.D.N.C.
Jan. 25, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.