Charles T. Cephas v. Maryland Rural Development Corporation Board of Directors

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1079
CHARLES T. CEPHAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND RURAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS;
CHERYL VICTORIA BEARD, Individually; ELAINE PATRICIA HILL,
Individually; MARY BOYCE, Individually; LEROY BOYCE, SR.,
Individually; REGINA M. FINCH, Individually; CHRISTINA
LOWMAN, Individually; RAYMOND SKINNER, Secretary; ANTHONY J.
MOHAN; CALVIN WINK, JR., CME, CMI; KEVIN BROOKS, Interim
Director,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:10-cv-00813-JFM)
Submitted: October 27, 2011 Decided: November 2, 2011
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles T. Cephas, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan R. Krasnoff,
Sarah Whynne Finnegan Rice, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; David Alan Rosenberg, FORD &
HARRISON, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Charles T. Cephas appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action for lack of subject-matter
jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Cephas v. Md. Rural Dev. Corp., No.
1:10-cv-00813-JFM (D. Md. Dec. 10, 2010). We deny as moot
Appellee Brooks’ motion to strike Cephas’ reply briefs. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --