The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-1028•Debbie Wright v. COMMONWEALTH PRIMARY CARE, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Wyndham Family Practice
11-1028Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 6, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1028
DEBBIE WRIGHT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH PRIMARY CARE, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Wyndham
Family Practice; MELANIE P. BOGGS, M.D.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00034-JRS)
Submitted: August 26, 2011 Decided: September 6, 2011
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William G. Shields, THE SHIELDS LAW FIRM, PLLC, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellant. Paul T. Walkinshaw, Garland B. Nagy,
HANCOCK, DANIEL, JOHNSON & NAGLE, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Debbie Wright appeals the district court’s orders
striking Wright’s expert designation and dismissing her
complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Wright v.
Commonwealth Primary Care, No. 3:10-cv-00034-JRS (E.D. Va.
Nov. 2 & Dec. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.