Deepak Rajani; Travellers.com v. the Travelers Indemnity Company

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-228
DEEPAK RAJANI; TRAVELLERS.COM,
Petitioners,
v.
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY,
Respondent.
On Petition for Permission to Appeal.
(1:10-cv-00448-LO-JFA)
Submitted: November 18, 2011 Decided: December 15, 2011
Before KING, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Deepak Rajani, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Deepak Rajani has filed a petition for permission to
appeal numerous district court orders under Fed. R. App. P. 5.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The
orders Rajani seeks to contest on appeal are neither final
orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders, and we
therefore lack jurisdiction to review the orders. Accordingly,
we deny Rajani’s petition for permission to appeal and deny
Rajani’s various pending motions filed in the appeal as moot.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --