The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7753•John C. Patterson v. Warden Fci Williamsburg
10-7753Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 23, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7753
JOHN C. PATTERSON,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG,
Respondent – Appellee,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (6:10-cv-02408-RMG)
Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 23, 2011
Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John C. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John C. Patterson, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on Patterson’s 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Warden
FCI Williamsburg, No. 6:10-cv-02408-RMG (D.S.C. Nov. 29, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.