Craig Latwain Chestnut v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Turbeville Correction Institution

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7748
CRAIG LATWAIN CHESTNUT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Turbeville
Correction Institution; CHARLES BROWN, SCDC Employee
Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (3:10-cv-02050-RMG)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Craig Latwain Chestnut, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Craig Latwain Chestnut appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Chestnut’s motion for appointment of
counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Chestnut v. S.C. Dep’t of Corr., No. 3:10-cv-02050-RMG (D.S.C.
Oct. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --