Anthony D. Hawks v. Larry David

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7724
ANTHONY D. HAWKS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
and
JANENERE HAWKS; DANA ANTHONY HAWKS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
LARRY DAVID; ALLEN ADKINS; DAVID PHIPPS; CHRISTOPHER TIMMS;
PAUL ABELL; JOSEPHINE BROWN; ALONG, First Name Unknown;
PARK, First Name Unknown; HUDSON, First Name Unknown;
SELMAN, First Name Unknown; FITZGERALD, First Name Unknown;
GEORGE, First Name Unknown; KREMER, First Name Unknown;
NANCY B. SHUAR; JAMES SALKIN; DANIAL L. SUSSMAN; GARY A.
TICKNOR; STATE OF MARYLAND; WILLIAM D. SCHAEFER; MARTIN
O’MALLEY; CITY OF BALTIMORE, MARYLAND; KURT SCHMOKE;
STEPHANIE RAWLINGS-BLAKE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (1:10-cv-02250-PJM)
Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 26, 2011
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Anthony D. Hawks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Anthony D. Hawks appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reconsider the order dismissing as time-
barred his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Hawks v. David,
No. 1:10-cv-02250-PJM (D. Md. Nov. 2, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --