The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7720•Samuel L. Brown v. Anthony Hathaway; Lillian Gilliam; Lt. Biggs; Ms. Walton
10-7720Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 6, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7720
SAMUEL L. BROWN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ANTHONY HATHAWAY; LILLIAN GILLIAM; LT. BIGGS; MS. WALTON,
Defendants– Appellees,
and
A. SPRUILL; GIBBS; SANDERLIN; C/O BROWN,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:09-ct-03004-BO)
Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel L. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Samuel L. Brown appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Brown V. Hathaway, No. 5:09-ct-03004-BO (E.D.N.C.
Sept. 29, 2009; Nov. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.