The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7709•JORGE GALEAS, JR., a/k/a Jorge Gevara v. Richard Neely
10-7709Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 23, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7709
JORGE GALEAS, JR., a/k/a Jorge Gevara,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
DELMAS M. BURCH; RYAN SHIPWASH; TRAVIS LOCKLEAR; ARTIS TAMAR
PERKINS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
RICHARD NEELY,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:10-cv-00599-RJC)
Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 23, 2011
Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jorge Galeas, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jorge Galeas, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action
without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative
remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Galeas v. Neely, No. 3:10-cv-00599-RJC
(W.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.