The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7600•United States of America v. Jimmie Darion Stanley, a/k/a Big Worm
10-7600Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 26, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7600
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JIMMIE DARION STANLEY, a/k/a Big Worm,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:06-cr-01001-TLW-1)
Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 26, 2011
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmie Darion Stanley, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham,
Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jimmie Darion Stanley seeks to appeal the extent of
the district court’s reduction of his sentence pursuant to the
Government’s Rule 35(b) motion. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (2006)
this court does not have “jurisdiction to review the extent of
the district court’s downward departure.” United States v.
Hill, 70 F.3d 321, 324 (4th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we dismiss
the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid in the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.