The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7593•John James Bell, a/k/a Omar Abdel-Al-Mumit v. Doris Ann Cooke, Rn
10-7593Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 29, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7593
JOHN JAMES BELL, a/k/a Omar Abdel-Al-Mumit,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DORIS ANN COOKE, RN; DOCTOR M. BEINOR; P. HOUGH, Inmate
Grievance Coordinator; WARDEN CECILIA REYNOLDS; ASSOCIATE
WARDEN JENNIE MCKAY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(8:10-cv-00398-HFF)
Submitted: April 11, 2011 Decided: April 29, 2011
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John James Bell, Appellant Pro Se. James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John James Bell appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bell v.
Cooke, No. 8:10-cv-00398-HFF (D.S.C. Nov. 2, 2010). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.