The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7586•Kevin D. Allen v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden
10-7586Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 10, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7586
KEVIN D. ALLEN,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:09-cv-00631-GBL-JFA)
Submitted: June 28, 2011 Decided: August 10, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin D. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Debra J. Prillaman, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin D. Allen, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Allen v. Stansberry, No.
1:09-cv-00631-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 14, 2010 & entered
Sept. 15, 2010). With regard to claims raised by Allen for the
first time on appeal, we find that Allen has waived
consideration. See First Virginia Banks, Inc. v. BP Exploration
& Oil, Inc., 206 F.3d 404, 407 n.1 (4th Cir. 2000). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.