The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7522•Terry Hendricks v. POWHATAN CORR. CENTER WARDEN/SUPERINTENDENT, sued in their individual
10-7522Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 23, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7522
TERRY HENDRICKS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
POWHATAN CORR. CENTER WARDEN/SUPERINTENDENT, sued in their
individual and official capacities; MR. GRAHAM, Counselor,
sued in their individual and official capacities; V. EVANS,
L.T.; SGT. R. JACKSON; C/O TALIAFERRO; SGT. GREEN; P.
GURNEY, Asst. Warden; MR. MAHON, Warden, sued in their
individual and official capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (2:10-cv-00445-RBS-FBS)
Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 23, 2011
Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terry Hendricks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Terry Hendricks appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Hendricks v. Powhatan Corr. Ctr., No.
2:10-cv-00445-RBS-FBS (E.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2010). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.