The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7453•United States of America v. BERNARD GIBSON, SR., a/k/a Bernard Willis
10-7453Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 18, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7453
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
BERNARD GIBSON, SR., a/k/a Bernard Willis,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:94-cr-00454-PJM-2)
Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 18, 2011
Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard Gibson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wilkinson,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bernard Gibson, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his self-styled Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United
States v. Gibson, No. 8:94-cr-00454-PJM-2 (D. Md. Oct. 8, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.