The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7451•Dewight Byrd, a/k/a Charles W. Reed, III v. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner of Correction
10-7451Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 29, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7451
DEWIGHT BYRD, a/k/a Charles W. Reed, III,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner of Correction; GARY MAYNARD,
Secretary of DPSCS; JOHN ROWLEY, Warden; D. NORTHCRAFT,
Chief of Security; WERNER, Lieutenant, In their Individual
and Official Capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:08-cv-02368-CCB)
Submitted: April 12, 2011 Decided: April 29, 2011
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dewight Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dewight Byrd appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on Byrd’s 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Byrd v. Stouffer, No.
1:08-cv-02368-CCB (D. Md. Sept. 30, 2010). We also deny Byrd’s
motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.