The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7429•Howell W. Woltz, Tep v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DAVID A. BERKEBILE, Warden
10-7429Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 20, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7429
HOWELL W. WOLTZ, TEP,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DAVID A. BERKEBILE, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger,
District Judge. (5:09-cv-01177-ICB)
Submitted: October 18, 2011 Decided: October 20, 2011
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Howell W. Woltz, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Horn,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charles T. Miller, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Howell W. Woltz appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part and
denying relief on his civil complaint filed pursuant to Bivens
v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403
U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Woltz v. United States, No. 5:09-cv-
01177-ICB (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 27, 2010). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.