Allen Lee Davis v. Detective Lt. Gray; Sergeant Peppers; Linda Sha Harris

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7412
ALLEN LEE DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DETECTIVE LT. GRAY; SERGEANT PEPPERS; LINDA SHA HARRIS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(9:09-cv-01296-HFF)
Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 28, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Allen Lee Davis, Appellant Pro Se. James Dean Jolly, Jr.,
LOGAN, JOLLY & SMITH, LLP, Anderson, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Allen Lee Davis appeals the district court’s amended
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. On
appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Davis challenges
only the propriety of the redaction of certain information from
summary judgment material submitted by Defendants Gray and
Peppers. Davis’s argument is irrelevant to whether the district
court correctly applied Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994),
to his claims of illegal search and seizure. Moreover, Davis’s
arguments on appeal do not relate to his claims against
Defendant Harris. Thus, Davis has forfeited appellate review of
the district court’s order by failing to challenge the basis for
the district court’s disposition. Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment of the district court.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --