Quinton F. Croom v. OFFICER FULLEN, K9 Unit

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7410
QUINTON F. CROOM,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
OFFICER FULLEN, K9 Unit,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
WARDEN SAM YOUNG,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:09-cv-00399-jlk-mfu)
Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 27, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Quinton F. Croom, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Parsons,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Quinton F. Croom appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Croom v. Fullen, No. 7:09-cv-00399-jlk-mfu (W.D. Va.
Sept. 28, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --