The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7390•Ocary Braithwaite v. GEORGE M. HINKLE, Warden (GRCC)
10-7390Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 24, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7390
OCARY BRAITHWAITE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GEORGE M. HINKLE, Warden (GRCC); THOMPSON, Dr., Medical
Physician; D. SPEARS, Nurse; BENJAMIN ELLIS, Medical
Physician; MR. GERARD F. BOYLE, CEO, Prison Health Srv.,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:09-cv-00879-TSE-JFA)
Submitted: January 25, 2011 Decided: February 24, 2011
Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ocary Braithwaite, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant George M.
Hinkle.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ocary Braithwaite appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to George Hinkle and dismissing his
complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Braithwaite v.
Hinkle, No. 1:09-cv-00879-TSE-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 20, 2010
& entered Sept. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.