The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7372•United States of America v. Cleveland McLean, Jr.
10-7372Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 28, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7372
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
CLEVELAND MCLEAN, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-5; 2:08-cv-00588-RGD)
Submitted: April 14, 2011 Decided: April 28, 2011
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cleveland McLean, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Neil H. MacBride,
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Certiorari dismissed, October 3, 2011
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cleveland McLean, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion. We previously
remanded the case for further consideration of McLean’s motion.
The district court reconsidered the motion and again denied it.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. McLean, Nos. 2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-5;
2:08-cv-00588-RGD (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 13 and entered Sept. 14,
2010). We grant McLean’s motion to supplement his informal
brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.