The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7368•Joseph Matthew Smith v. WENDY SHARPE, Nurse
10-7368Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 27, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7368
JOSEPH MATTHEW SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WENDY SHARPE, Nurse; JAMES KAY, Doctor; W.F. MCFADDEN,
Doctor; R.L. NEVILLE, Doctor; JON OZMINT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(1:09-cv-01482-TLW)
Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 27, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Matthew Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Janet Brooks Holmes,
Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA & STUBLEY, PA,
Columbia, South Carolina; Bradford Cary Andrews, Samuel F.
Arthur, III, AIKEN, BRIDGES, NUNN, ELLIOTT & TYLER, PA,
Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Matthew Smith appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Smith v. Sharpe, No. 1:09-cv-01482-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 13,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.