The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7366•United States of America v. Vincent Jennell, Jr.
10-7366Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 21, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7366
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
VINCENT JENNELL, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior
District Judge. (7:02-cr-00032-jct-3)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 20, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincent Jennell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Vincent Jennell, Jr., appeals a district court order
denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing and appointment of
counsel. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court.
See United States v. Jennell, No. 7:02-cr-00032-jct-3 (W.D. Va.
Sept. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.