The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-7362•United States of America v. Willie Reynolds
10-7362Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 20, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7362
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
WILLIE REYNOLDS,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton
Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:90-cr-00054-NCT-1)
Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 20, 2011
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Winston-Salem, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Willie Reynolds appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. See United States v. Reynolds, No. 6:90-cr-00054-NCT-1
(M.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.